Name: Everyday Democracy. Liberals, Conservatives, and Their Routine Political Lives
Price: 34.26 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Deborah J. Schildkraut;Jeffrey M. Berry;James M. Glaser
ISBN: 9780226845104

portada Everyday Democracy. Liberals, Conservatives, and Their Routine Political Lives

Everyday Democracy. Liberals, Conservatives, and Their Routine Political Lives

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

University of Chicago Press

Autor

Deborah J. Schildkraut;Jeffrey M. Berry;James M. Glaser

Colección

Chicago Studies in American Politics

Año

2025

N° páginas

256

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.90 x 15.20 cm

ISBN13

9780226845104

Everyday Democracy. Liberals, Conservatives, and Their Routine Political Lives

Deborah J. Schildkraut;Jeffrey M. Berry;James M. Glaser (Autor) · University of Chicago Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Origen: Estados Unidos

Envío: 5 a 6 días háb.

$ 36.40$ 34.26

-6%

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 3 unidades

$ 34.26

Llega entre el 03 Ago y el 06 Ago a FL. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Everyday Democracy. Liberals, Conservatives, and Their Routine Political Lives"

How the everyday habits and attitudes of ordinary liberals and conservatives shape the health of American democracy. In Everyday Democracy, Jeffrey M. Berry, James M. Glaser, and Deborah J. Schildkraut study Americans’ views of several manifestations of “everyday democracy,” which they define as the attitudes, behaviors, and processes that people experience in daily life and their routine considerations of politics and community. Examples include engaging in dialogue with political opponents and giving politicians license to compromise. Ordinary political moments like these constitute much of politics, and they can lay the foundation that shapes if, when, and how crisis moments unfold. Paying particular attention to the role of ideology in shaping how Americans emulate daily democratic ideals, this book considers such questions as: How do liberals and conservatives support different aspects of democratic practice, and are there ideological asymmetries between the two groups? If and when asymmetries emerge, what factors might explain them? The authors consider what their findings mean for the health of American democracy broadly.