Compartir
Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice: 22 (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law, Series Number 22) (en Inglés)
Mordechai Kremnitzer
(Ilustrado por)
·
Talya Steiner
(Ilustrado por)
·
Andrej Lang
(Ilustrado por)
·
Cambridge University Press
· Tapa Dura
Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice: 22 (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law, Series Number 22) (en Inglés) - Kremnitzer, Mordechai ; Steiner, Talya ; Lang, Andrej
$ 150.32
$ 168.00
Ahorras: $ 17.68
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis ListasSe enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Jueves 02 de Mayo y el
Viernes 03 de Mayo.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Estados Unidos entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice: 22 (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law, Series Number 22) (en Inglés)"
Proportionality in Action presents an empirical and comparative exploration of the proportionality doctrine, based on detailed accounts of the application of the framework by apex courts in six jurisdictions: Germany, Canada, South Africa, Israel, Poland and India. The analysis of each country is written and contextualized by a constitutional scholar from the relevant jurisdiction. Each country analysis draws upon a large sample of case law and employs a mixed methodological approach: an expansive coding scheme allows for quantitative analysis providing comparable and quantifiable measurements, which is enriched by qualitative analysis that engages with the substance of the decisions and captures nuance, contextualizing the data and providing it with meaning. The book concludes with a comparative chapter that synthesizes some of the most interesting findings. Focusing on deviations of the practice of proportionality from theory, the authors conclude their argument in support of an integrated approach to the application of proportionality.
