Compartir
Instability and Non-Uniqueness for the 2d Euler Equations, After m. Vishik: (Ams-219) (Annals of Mathematics Studies, 219) (en Inglés)
Lellis Camillo De,Brué Elia,Albritton Dallas (Autor)
·
Princeton Univ Pr
· Tapa Dura
Instability and Non-Uniqueness for the 2d Euler Equations, After m. Vishik: (Ams-219) (Annals of Mathematics Studies, 219) (en Inglés) - Lellis Camillo De,Brué Elia,Albritton Dallas
$ 165.00
$ 223.93
Ahorras: $ 58.93
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis ListasSe enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Lunes 20 de Mayo y el
Martes 21 de Mayo.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Estados Unidos entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Instability and Non-Uniqueness for the 2d Euler Equations, After m. Vishik: (Ams-219) (Annals of Mathematics Studies, 219) (en Inglés)"
An essential companion to M. Vishik's groundbreaking work in fluid mechanics The incompressible Euler equations are a system of partial differential equations introduced by Leonhard Euler more than 250 years ago to describe the motion of an inviscid incompressible fluid. These equations can be derived from the classical conservations laws of mass and momentum under some very idealized assumptions. While they look simple compared to many other equations of mathematical physics, several fundamental mathematical questions about them are still unanswered. One is under which assumptions it can be rigorously proved that they determine the evolution of the fluid once we know its initial state and the forces acting on it. This book addresses a well-known case of this question in two space dimensions. Following the pioneering ideas of M. Vishik, the authors explain in detail the optimality of a celebrated theorem of V. Yudovich from the 1960s, which states that, in the vorticity formulation, the solution is unique if the initial vorticity and the acting force are bounded. In particular, the authors show that Yudovich's theorem cannot be generalized to the L p setting.
